Adult sharksucker remora (Elizabeth. naucrates).
The best ranks GLMM to own Age. naucrates contained all predictors (website function, gender, readiness, and you can 12 months) (S1 Table). The fresh model (Fig 8) shows that Age. naucrates was in fact probably to-be introduce that have Yards. alfredi in the tidy up channels, that happen to be 44% more likely than simply during the giving section (Or = 0.51). It hitchhiker varieties has also been probably becoming introduce to your lady in their 4 th trimester of pregnancy (Or = dos.6), which had been 160% higher than low-expecting people (site classification), when you’re people (Or = 0.59) was 41% less inclined to has actually E. naucrates hitchhikers than just non-expecting women. Echeneis naucrates have been least probably be expose on teenager Meters. alfredi (Otherwise = 0.67), which have been 29% less likely to fully grasp this hitchhiker varieties than adults (reference group). The latest GLMM and additionally shows that the possibilities of Age. naucrates exposure that have Yards. alfredi is actually high within the NE Monsoon (reference group), which was twenty five% apt to be than simply from inside the SW Monsoon (Or = 0.75).
Indicates the likelihood of presence in comparison with the reference category shown in the legend. OR values are plotted with 95% confidence intervals (CI; solid horizontal lines). Where the CI does not span 1, the explanatory variable is significantly more likely when OR > 1, and significantly less likely when OR < 1. (A) Mobula alfredi and Echeneis naucrates, (B) M. alfredi and juvenile E. naucrates, (C) M. alfredi and Lutjanus bohar, (D) M. alfredi and Gnathanodon speciosus presence, and (E) M. birostris and Remora remora.
Teenager sharksucker remora (Age. naucrates).
The highest ranks GLMM for juvenile Elizabeth. naucrates consisted of all predictors (webpages form, gender, maturity, and you may year). This new design (Fig 8) datingranking.net/sugar-daddies-usa/ny/roshester/ suggests that juvenile Elizabeth. naucrates was probably becoming establish which have Meters. alfredi from the feeding section (Or = 2.08), that has been 108% likely to be than from the clean up station (site classification). Juvenile E. naucrates was basically and expected to show up on juvenile M. alfredi (Otherwise = 2.37), which were 137% more likely to get this hitchhiker category than grownups (site class). Men Meters. alfredi (Otherwise = step one.59) have been 59% probably be than just women for juvenile Elizabeth. naucrates introduce, and you can juvenile E. naucrates had been least probably be present which have Meters. alfredi in SW Monsoon (Or = 0.63); 37% not likely than just when you look at the NE Monsoon (site category).
Purple snapper (L. bohar).
The highest ranking GLMM for L. bohar (Fig 8) contained one significant predictor (site function) and suggests that the species were most likely to be present with M. alfredi at cleaning stations (reference category), which was 100% more likely than at feeding areas (OR = 0). There was one model with ?AICc <2 (S1 Table), which was the same as the highest-ranking model with the addition of season, but this predictor was non-significant (p>0.05).
Wonderful trevally (G. speciosus).
The highest ranking GLMM for G. speciosus contained two significant predictors (site function and maturity status). Gnathanodon speciosus were most likely to be present with M. alfredi at cleaning stations (reference category), which was 22% more likely than at feeding areas (OR = 0.78) (Fig 8). There were two models with ?AICc <2 (S1 Table). One of these models contained the same predictors as the highest-ranking model with the addition of season, but this predictor was non-significant (p>0.05). The other model contained only the predictor maturity status, which suggested G. speciosus were more likely to be present on juvenile M. alfredi (OR = 1.5), which were 55% more likely to have this hitchhiker species than adults (reference category).